Technology Does Not Replace the Constitution
Modern surveillance technology is advancing rapidly, but constitutional protections must keep pace. From automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and Flock cameras to geofence warrants and artificial intelligence, expanding government surveillance raises important questions about privacy, due process, and the Fourth Amendment. This article examines recent cases involving mistaken identification and alleged misuse of surveillance data, arguing that technology should never replace independent investigation or diminish constitutional safeguards. As government gains new investigative tools, preserving individual liberty, government accountability, and the presumption of innocence becomes more, not less, essential.